The Sound of Music

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

The Sound of Music, the Swastika, and Human Freedom

 David Alan Black

Last night my wife and I enjoyed one of the greatest stage productions I have ever witnessed. The place was the Raleigh Performing Arts Theater, and the musical was The Sound of Music. The final collaboration between composer Richard Rodgers and lyricist Oscar Hammerstein, who passed away just nine months after the opening, The Sound of Music is, to my mind, the most “musical” of musicals ever made. Based on Maria Von Trapp’s autobiography The Story of the Trapp Family Singers, the original play was to have contained only actual music that had been sung by the Trapps in their concerts, plus one original song by Rodgers and Hammerstein. When the talented songwriting duo balked at this, however, they were allowed to contribute the entire score.

The 1965 film version co-staring Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer is especially nostalgic for me, as I first saw it on a date with my then wife-to-be. Last night’s stage production, however, was every bit as memorable an experience—filled with laughter, tears, and of course, some of the most unforgettable music ever written. At the play’s end, as the family wends its way up the mountain, you are hit squarely between the eyes with the importance of freedom and of staying true to your ideals.

Set in Austria in 1938, The Sound of Music tells the story of Maria Rainer, a free-spirited nun who is hired by Captain George Von Trapp to care for his seven children. Ignoring the Captain’s demands for strict child-rearing, Maria wins the children’s affection with her natural warmth and kindness. One night, the children sing at a dinner party given by the Captain to introduce his friends to his love interest, the Baroness Schraeder. Later that evening, as the Captain and Maria look into each other’s eyes while performing an Austrian folk dance, they realize they’ve fallen in love.

Confused by her new emotions, Maria returns to the Abbey, where she confesses her love for the Captain to the Mother Abbess, who encourages her to “climb every mountain” to find her true love. Maria returns to the Trapp villa, where eventually she and the Captain make plans to marry. While they are on their honeymoon, the Anschluss takes place and the Nazis occupy Austria. Meanwhile, Max Detweiler, a kindly uncle figure who is quite willing to compromise with the Nazis in order to save his own neck, has entered the children in the local music festival. The Captain returns to find he has been called back into military service by the German government. Appalled by the Nazis, he plots an escape and the family packs hastily. While fleeing the Trapp villa, the family is spotted by storm troopers. They explain that they are merely on the way to perform at the festival. The family appears and sings, planning to flee after the final number, “So Long, Farewell.” The Nazis discover their plans, but the von Trapps make a dramatic escape, hiding in the Abbey before escaping to freedom.

Its was during this final episode, with the family singing before the watchful eye of the Nazis, that I was once again deeply impressed with the hideous evil that lay behind the Captain’s desire to escape to freedom. There on stage stood a giant Nazi flag—the dreaded Swastika, symbol of national power and of a nation gone mad. “Swastika,” of course, is derived from the Sanskrit word svastikah, which means “being fortunate.” For centuries it was a symbol of peace, laughter, joy, and good luck. In fact, a few years ago, as voters in Nepal went to the polls, they expressed their choice by stamping a swastika next to the name of the candidate of their preference. Farmers in Tibet frequently place a swastika on their home doors lest evil enter the place. A similar custom is followed by Irish farmers, where the swastika placed in their doors is called a Brigit’s cross.

Most historians agree that it was Hitler himself who chose the swastika as a symbol of his movement. Hitler claimed that the form in which the Nazis used the swastika was based on a design by Dr. Friedrich Krohn, a dentist from Starnberg who had belonged to several völkisch groups, including the Germanen Order. Krohn submitted his design of a flag that had been used at the founding meeting of his own party local—a swastika against a black-white- red background. As Hitler noted in Mein Kampf: “…a dentist from Starnberg did deliver a design that was not bad after all, and, incidentally, was quite close to my own, having only the one fault that a swastika with curved legs was composed into a white disk.”

Krohn knew that the Buddhist destroverse, or clockwise swastika symbolized good fortune and made his design accordingly, with the swastika’s legs pointing to the left. The majority of the Nazi leaders accepted Krohn’s design, but Hitler insisted on a sinistroverse or anti-clockwise one and changed the design accordingly.

Interestingly, Hitler’s first contact with the swastika may have occurred while he was a young student with the Benedictines at the Abbey of Lambach-am-Traum in upper Austria. At Lambach Hitler saw the swastika engraved on the four corners of the monastery, where it had been sculpted several years before following orders of the abbot, Theodorich Hagen. An erudite ecclesiastic, Father Hagen had studied astrology and the occult sciences. In 1856 he made a trip to the Near East, visiting Persia, Arabia, Turkey, and the Caucasus. Upon his return to Lambach in 1868 he hired workers and cabinet makers whom he ordered to sculpt the swastika on the four corners of the building and even on some religious objects. One of the swastikas at Lambach is depicted in the photo on the left.

When young Adolf Hitler became a student at Lambach, Father Hagen had already died, but the swastikas he ordered carved were still there. In 1920, when Hitler was appointed chief of propaganda for the National Socialist Party, he realized that the party needed a powerful symbol to identify it and distinguish it from rival groups. Since in Nazi theory the Aryans were the German’s ancestors, Hitler concluded that the swastika, which had been “eternally anti-Semitic” (as he put it), would be the perfect symbol for “the victory of the Aryan man.”

The swastika flag proved to be a dramatic symbol indeed, and produced a hypnotic effect on the masses. The Nazi flag was red with a black sinistroverse swastika, most often appearing lying at an angle to produce an even more dynamic illusion of circular movement. The swastika can be seen as the axis around which the whole Nazi movement revolved. The mystical pagan associations of the swastika are evident even in the SS altars that were used for weddings and child-naming ceremonies.

As I gazed on this hypnotic symbol of totalitarianism, I could not help but be reminded of the fight we are in today against despotism, and how important it is for all freedom-loving Americans to resolve to say no to tyranny and yes to freedom and the Constitution. Unlike the Max Detweilers of the world, who live by expediency and compromise instead of principle and honor, true biblical faith means that if I am tolerating something in my society that is unbiblical or unconstitutional, I will repent of that way of thinking and will attempt to do something about it!

Back in January I said that this is the year for action. I still believe that. With God’s help, let us all work harder than ever to bring about a rebirth of biblical values and constitutional liberty in this great country of ours, before it is too late.

July 20, 2003

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading The Sound of Music

Solus Christus

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

Solus Christus, Sola Scriptura!

 David Alan Black

The Christian doctrine of church and state is today being reassessed in virtually every situation of conflict around the world.

As readers of DBO well know, I have been a critic of “state theology” even as I have affirmed government as a God-given institution for the common good of society. Unfortunately, we live in a day when a cacophony of ideological pragmatisms distorts the proper relation of church and state. The compromising relationship between church and state that has manifested itself throughout history is clearly visible today.

It is almost a cliché to say that the Christian Right in America has engaged in statism by its almost blind allegiance to the Bush administration. Many prominent evangelical leaders have argued that the Republican Party is the only home for conservatives and is by nature a legitimation of constitutional ideology. Others have promoted it as a political resource for spiritual change. An objective analysis of the history of the party seems to suggest that it is neither.

The majority perspective current among evangelicals is one that both blesses and legitimizes the warfare-welfare state. This should not surprise us; this has been the dominant position of the church since the Constantinian settlement either through direct support or by default. At other times, however, the church—although usually only minority groups within the church—has rejected the status quo by affirming the rule of God, which more often than not has meant a renunciation of the existing social order.

The role of the Confessing Church in Nazi Germany is a good example of a church aroused to demand “No King But Jesus!” Ironically, it was the established church in Germany that became the oppressor, reflecting the sociological propensity toward statism. As I noted in Karl Barth and the German Church Conflict,

Barth and others like him resisted peace at any price. To those who believed in accommodation with the idolatrous state he stated, in unmistakably clear terms, “No Compromise!” Thus the heart of the German church struggle lay in the confessing of Jesus Christ, for to confess Christ meant not to confess others as Christ. Witness to Jesus Christ alone meant, under the Third Reich, the denial of neo-German paganism and of the German-Christian heresy. Certainly we are in a totally different situation today, yet as we read these statements of Barth we find our own situation mirrored in them. It may be that our way forward is also to be found in them—the way of confession to Jesus Christ alone.

Barth argued that the church urgently needed a Christian ethics of politics precisely in order that believers might avoid a wrong politicization of Christianity. Whenever the church has promoted the ideology of the ruling class or legitimated a particular political cause it has found itself in ideological captivity.

A Christian ethics of politics is, therefore, needed—one that, at the very least, recognizes the limits of political structures and the sinfulness of human nature, that acknowledges the limits to what can be achieved in the sphere of politics, and that affirms the biblical injunction that Christians are to obey God rather than human authority, should that authority command what is contrary to the declared will of God:

Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men (Acts 5:29).

The ever-recurring need of the church is to discover what it means to confess the transcendent God of the Bible within the political structures of a particular place. Throughout history Christian theology has affirmed a political option beyond both tyranny and anarchy. The church can and must maintain a stubborn and restless hope for something more than what any existing socio-political order has been able to provide. At the same time it must not compromise its principles for the sake of expediency. Unqualified allegiance to Christ (solus Christus) and uncompromising devotion to biblical truth (sola scriptura) are the twin safeguards against the fury by which the exercise of political power begins to devour itself.

March 5, 2004

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com. His latest book, Why I Stopped Listening to Rush: Confessions of a Recovering Neocon, will be released this year.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading Solus Christus

Sober Thoughts On An Inauguration

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

Sober Thoughts On An Inauguration

 David Alan Black 

Yesterday, as I read the president’s inaugural remarks (I don’t watch TV), I felt little joy or enthusiasm. Why, I thought, can’t I join in the festive celebration and praise this encomium to “liberty” and “freedom”?

Was it because, as the Wall Street Journal’s Peggy Noonan put it, Mr. Bush seemed “over the top”? Or were my qualms rooted in the speech’s adulation of the state? As Peter Robinson noted in the National Review:

The speech was in almost no way that of a conservative. To the contrary. It amounted to a thoroughgoing exaltation of the state.

Bush has just announced that we must remake the entire third world in order to feel safe in our own homes, and he has done so without sounding a single note of reluctance or hesitation. This overturns the nation’s fundamental stance toward foreign policy since its inception. Washington warned of “foreign entanglements.” The second President Adams asserted that “we go not abroad in search of monsters to destroy.” During the Cold War, even Republican presidents made it clear that we played our large role upon the world stage only to defend ourselves and our allies, seeking to changed the world by our example rather than by force.

My reluctance to join in the excitement was based on none of these observations. My concerns are, at the heart of the matter, theological and not political.

My attitude toward civil government is grounded on what the apostle Paul teaches about the depravity of man. This teaching allows us to see through the fallacies contained in such statements that, if only all men would live up to the ideals of the Sermon on the Mount, the kingdom of God would be realized on earth. The Christian Gospel is not to be found in the Sermon on the Mount but rather in Paul’s proclamation of justification by faith and by grace. Man is basically incapable of saving himself, and that is why it is such “Good News” that God sent His Son into the world to save the world.

If men cannot save themselves, still less can they save the world or usher in the kingdom of God, however hard they try. Remember this the next time you hear a president say, “There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment and expose the pretensions of tyrants and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom.” The best of our accomplishments are tainted by our egotism and pride, however pure we may look from the outside. As Alec Vidler once put it, “It is precisely when you consider the best in man that you see there is in each of us a hard core of pride or self-centeredness which corrupts our best achievements and blights our best experiences” (Secular Despair and Christian Faith, p. 22).

And so, while Christians will do all the good they can for society, they do not do so with any pretentious claim that they are creating a new world. I agree with Mark Jurries who recently said:

The Middle East will see no peace until it embraces the Gospel. (I include Israel in that; there seem to be some evangelicals who have forgotten that Israel is as pagan as its neighbors.) The military is made to break things, not to fix them and certainly not to build them. The new-world-order types may mean well, but they’ll only become tyrants themselves if they follow this course.

I must confess that to me the effusive praise for the president’s speech is reminiscent of the Ephesian demonstrators who cried out “Great is Diana of the Ephesians!” for two hours. Of course, the cult of Diana was utterly repugnant to the apostle Paul. For him the only real God was the holy, living, eternal Being of whom it was said, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” All the ancient gods were but fantasy and folly.

I suppose that some might think I’m being a bit too somber. I can see their point. I would like to think, however, that I am being sober, not somber. I have often pointed out to my New Testament students how Paul constantly had to tell his converts to think soberly, probably because they were liable to become over-excited. At any rate, I believe that every Christian should be able to agree that “Here we have no lasting kingdom, but we seek the city that is to come” (Heb. 13:14). I see this verse as a healthy antidote to all forms of utopianism, including “triumphalistic Americanism.” If the early church “turned the world upside down” (Acts 17:6), it was not by advancing democracy and freedom at the point of the sword but by preaching the Gospel.

I shall always fear for my country as long as she fails to grapple with the sober truth that there is only one remedy for man’s enslavement, and that remedy is to be found in the Gospel and not in the efforts of men. It occurred to me as I read the president’s speech that perhaps this remedy, so desperately needed in the first century, is no less desperately needed today in the world of 2005.

January 21, 2005

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading Sober Thoughts On An Inauguration

So You’re Offended

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

So You’re Offended by the Super Bowl Half-Time?

 David Alan Black 

All this pseudo-outrage over a bare-breasted moral meltdown at the Super Bowl half-time has me scratching my head. Yes, people have the right to bloviate all they want to, but the solution to the problem of crude dudes on the boob tube (pun intended) is so obvious a blind man could see it:                  

TURN OFF THE STUPID TV AND LEAVE IT OFF!

On Super Bowl Sunday I took my wife out to dinner. Neither of us was even remotely interested in watching prime time commercialism run amok. (We made sure that the restaurant did not have a TV blaring in the corner, either.) I refuse to get my war news from the major networks. TV prefers to sanitize war. It delights in showing the rescue of a cute blond-haired soldier but not a badly burned Iraqi boy. Disagree? The following was ABC’s Wednesday night promo on April 9, 2003.

Tonight at 9 PM don’t miss The Bachelor. He’s handsome, he’s single, he’s heir to a fortune. What lucky girl will he choose? And at 10, it’s an ABC News Special Report: The Battle For Baghdad. 

Barbara Ehrenreich once said: “When you watch television, you never see people watching television. We love television because it brings us a world in which television does not exist.”

You wish. “We’ve managed to turn this into a truly viable American holiday” said Bob Thompson, a professor of culture and TV at Syracuse, referring to the Super Bowl. “But the centerpiece isn’t the Christmas tree or the turkey, it’s the TV set, and cuisine you can pick up at the convenience store.” Now that’s sad.

Remember the joke about the guy who got a fortune cookie with a message in it that read: “Help, I’m being held captive in a fortune cookie factory?” Well, in a twist on that, I can hear TV addicts murmuring, “Help, this idiot box of mine is spewing forth idiocy!” Like, duh.

So here’s a question: What if you just stopped wasting your brainwaves on the airwaves? Oh, I hear people moaning despairingly, if only producers would police themselves and protect us from fiascos like the one that took place during the Super Bowl burlesque show. My answer is, You’re whining about what? Get real, folks. There’s so much idiotic trash on the tube that it’s become a joke, albeit a very serious one. Once again, the solution that says “Clean up your act, or else!” is as effective as trying to hang ten without a surfboard. The network Big Boys will only resort to their arsenal of money, lies, and excuses.

The greatest danger in our society these days is not network programming. Rather, it is the insidious tendency of We the Viewing Public to relinquish any modicum of common sense. We have become a nation of glued-to-the-tube numbskulls who prefer “Reality TV” to life as our Creator God intended it to be lived. The irony is that those of us who are most aware of the problem—not to mention the solution—are willing to sacrifice their evening worship services and choir rehearsals for ephemeral amusements such as a silly football game.

The bottom of the bottom line: Breaking up IS hard to do, as the old song says. If we were really serious about cutting our television umbilical cords we would have no alternative but to find other ways of entertaining our lonely psyches—ways that might actually require creativity or, may it never be, activity! Meanwhile, why should we go through the trouble of facing our problems when we can hide them inside a 36 inch box? Dead fish prove it’s easier to go with the flow than to swim upstream.

So let’s stop pretending. We have no intention of doing what our common sense demands and turning off our TVs. And, since that’s the case, it sure don’t make an awful lot of sense to browbeat the TV execs for feeding us the Mad Cow Fare we crave.

February 4, 2004

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com. His latest book, Why I Stopped Listening to Rush: Confessions of a Recovering Neocon, will be released this year.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading So You’re Offended

So We

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

So We’ve Studied Acts. What Now?

 David Alan Black  

Jason Evans, one of our excellent pastor-teachers at Bethel Hill, is concluding his series on the book of Acts this month. It has been an astonishing look at the early church. (For summaries, go to theBHBC blog.) How can what happened then happen now? This is the question I can’t get out of my mind.

So we’ve studied Acts. What now?

These early Christians were not perfect. But they put first things first. Evangelism was a “first things” category, and every believer sought to bear witness to Christ. “Make disciples of all nations” was more than a platitude. They were in the Good News business, all of them. They evangelized the world, and did so without mission boards or courses in soul winning. There is no hint they viewed ministry — whether pastoral or missional — as the task of the ordained clergy alone. Everyone was a minister! Moreover, the spiritual was never separated from the social. Like Jesus, they went everywhere doing good and preaching the Gospel of the kingdom. Why can’t we aim for the same balance today? We cannot have presence alone or proclamation alone. Both are needed. The early church was salt in the midst of a crumbling society. People could see in their lives the transforming power of the Gospel. They cared about the hungry and the poor. They realized that preaching without loving practical assistance was mere talk. Ask anyone who comes to our health center in Southern Ethiopia what brought them there and their answer will be the same: the health care! That many of them are, at the same time, brought under the conviction of the Holy Spirit is due to the genuine Christianity of our staff and their zeal to share the love of Jesus with everyone they meet.

The early church had a quality of shared life that must have been remarkable. Theirs was an every-member priesthood. Theirs was a shared leadership. They prayed and fasted. Their meetings were invariably participatory. Let specatorism be left to the pagans in the arena! We each have a gift. We each have a responsibility to take some active initiative for Jesus! They saw static religion and an over-emphasis on buildings as a betrayal of the New Covenant. (See Stephen’s speech in Acts 7.)

What more can I say? The guidelines are there, and they demand from us a response. At every stage we are completely dependent upon the Spirit in the work of renewal and restoration. We cannot effect change on our own. We cannot force the issue. And we cannot escape our utter dependence on the work of the Spirit in us (2 Cor. 3:18).

Don’t we want that power in our churches today? Or will we be content with the status quo — churches that are dull, predictable, bourgeois, dominated by clergy — a shallow and ineffective parody of what the church should be?

February 19, 2011

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading So We

Smelling Ethiopia

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

Smelling Ethiopia

 David Alan Black  

I will never forget the very first trip Becky and I made to Ethiopia together in 2004. When we deplaned in Addis Ababa, she turned to me and, with great excitement in her eyes, asked, “Can you smell it, honey?”

Have you ever “smelled” a country? TCKs can (Third Culture Kids). They’ve lived in so many places, smelled so many different smells, heard so many different sounds, been in so many different situations, that they experience the world in many different dimensions. Becky can easily and fearlessly walk into most any situation in Ethiopia with absolute poise and equanimity. Crossing cultures is no big deal for her. Never has been. It was like that when I took her to live in Switzerland too.

I believe I’m the same way, though I’m not sure why (I’m no TCK). Perhaps it was because I grew up in a transient society like Hawaii (people were always arriving and then, before you knew it, they were leaving again). It may be due to the ethnic diversity I enjoyed so much there (and miss so terribly here on the mainland) – with Japanese and Philippinos and Koreans and Chinese and Portuguese and Hawaiians and Blacks and Caucasians all intermingling. I think being an ethnic minority as a child also contributed to my compassion for people of other races (Caucasians were outnumbered by Asians in Hawaii, and still are).

Be that as it may, Becky and I think a cross-cultural lifestyle is so normal that we hardly realize just how easy it is for us to minister in Ethiopia. We have a sense of intimacy with our Ethiopian family, a feeling that we fit in. It was like that from day one for Becky, and from about day two for me.

Somehow this freedom to step outside one’s own culture is very liberating. It doesn’t solve all of our cross-cultural dilemmas, of course, but it does give us permission for a lot of self-discovery and for adapting to people who are vastly different from us. I am eager to learn yet more about Ethiopian culture and society on our next trip coming up this May and June. But one thing I can say in all honesty is this:

I can now smell Ethiopia.

March 5, 2007

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading Smelling Ethiopia

Sleepless in Addis Ababa

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

Sleepless in Addis Ababa

 Becky Lynn Black  

(Written on Jan. 13, 2008. It was the beginning of a 10-week trip to help the wife of an Ethiopian evangelist have a safe delivery of her baby.)

I have now spent five nights in Addis; four of these I slept very little because of the time change. After 32 hours of travel, and 8 hours difference in time zone, it takes a while to get in sync again.

Aberesh and I are enjoying the hospitality of a couple from the United States. Like most homes in Addis, their home is inside a compound. This compound is about 100 feet square. It is surrounded by a high wall made of cement block; many walls have cut glass or barbed wire on top, but ours doesn’thave this. Along two sides of the compound, against the wall, is a narrow garden area with flowers. Otherwise the entire interior of the compound is cemented. Along the back wall are a clothes line and a high tower that holds the water tank. Along the side wall is a narrow building with 3 rooms, a toilet room, and cold shower; Aberesh and I are staying in one of these rooms. The main house is medium sized by our standards, with 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, a dining room/living room area, and a small kitchen.

This compound is guarded almost 24 hours with a zebanya (guard) and a big dog. Girma is the day guard; he is completely deaf and cannot speak, but he can write both English and Amharic excellently! So we communicate through notes. One day we neglected to get the pen and paper, so he began writing on his arm by scratching in his dark skin. He ran out of space, so I offered my arm, but it didn’t show up on my white skin! Since he can’t hear people knock on the large metal gate, he watches the dog to know when to come to the gate. He has the love of the Lord Jesus in his face, and is so happy and industrious. He is the one who cares for the garden, and he gave me a wonderful tour of all the plants. He is a great blessing to me. The afternoon guard is named Haile and the night guard is Goshu. The door to our room will not close, much less lock, so we are trusting the guards and our Lord Jesus completely for our safety at night.

As I’ve laid awake at night, I’ve gained a new appreciation for this city. As the sun sets, the people go to their homes, the streets become bare, the multitudes of homeless people struggle to survive, and the dogs rule the city. Most compounds have a watchdog, and there are also dogs that roam the city. Sothey have their little clubs that go scavenging and visiting. It really gets interesting when a hyena shows up! Only one night in this past week have I heard a hyena outside in the street. It was amazing to me that hyenas still came into Addis! As in the countryside, a prowling hyena, with his unique low growl, will set the dogs on their tails. So the dog volume rose to a heightened, frenetic pitch when our neighborhood hyena arrived. (Remember, hyenas have jaws so strong they can break the thigh of an elephant! These animals are greatly respected in Africa.)

Also, the city rats come out at night. Rats in Addis are very big; they have much garbage to eat. For hours they play on the tin roof of our little room. They sound more like 2-ton trucks from their weight, but their little feet with claws have the tell-tale sound of rat walk! There were several times in the past week that I lay in my bed and thanked the Lord Jesus for putting us in a cement room. Out in the countryside the houses are made of sticks and mud; the rats easily enter rooms looking for food. (On several occasions, I and others have had rats run over us as we lay on the floor of a village church.) To have a rat-proof room is a special blessing from Him.

From time to time I can hear the music of the guards calling to each other, one compound to the other. They always call in the form of whistles. I think sometimes they are alerting each other to possible intruders; other times, I think they are saying “what have you got to eat tonight?” But then there are times when I think one guard is trying to wake up a sleeping guard! The same whistle over and over and over, without an answering whistle!

As I said, in Addis Ababa the night also belongs to the homeless. There are hundreds of thousands of people living on the streets or in the city sewer system. Most of these are under the age of 20. Our own “daughter” once belonged to this group of people. As darkness falls, these people must remain alert. Danger abounds everywhere – thievery, murder, assault.  They form little bands to help each other, but there is a price to be paid for the privilege of belonging to a band. During the daytime, we can easily see some of these homeless ones; they are almost always sleeping in the medians, or snuggled against the outside wall to a compound, or under a random bush somewhere. They sleep all day so that they can stay awake all night. How my heart aches for them, these dear ones that society and families have abandoned! Our Lord knows and cares for each one. Will we be His hands in loving them?

Can you see the two makeshift shelters in this photo?

Telling time during the night is easy, if you know the schedule of airport flights. The roaring of the huge inter-continental jets fills the air at flight times. The Ethiopian Airline and KLM flights leave at 11 pm, the British Airways flight arrives at 2:30 am and again at 4:30. But as we all know, flight schedules canchange or be delayed. However, the Orthodox prayers are always exactly on schedule. So at precisely 5:00am, all over the city, loudspeakers blare with these prayers.  Of course, very few people can understand them. They are in the Ge’ez language, which is the ancient Ethiopian language. The prayers are done in chant/singing form, and are really beautiful to listen to, unless you’d rather be sleeping! These prayers go on for an hour, from 5-6 am, unless it is a special day on the church calendar, and then the prayers will go almost all night long. I often use their broadcast time to pray for those precious people caught in the web of theOrthodox Church system.

The greatest blessing I have received during the night hours came the first night that Aberesh came here. I’d guess it was about 2 o’clock in the morning, and I heard her praying. For almost an hour, I could hear her whispering her prayer. Of course, I can’t understand what she was saying, but it was the firstnight after visiting the doctor. There’s little doubt in my mind that she was bringing the burden of her pregnancy, and the fears of what lay in the future to her loving Father. What a special honor, to be allowed by Him to listen as this dear woman talked with her Lord in the silence of the night hours.

I often look up at the moon here and think, “That’s the same moon that shines over Virginia.” And I recall that the earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof, as the Psalmist put it. The Lord of All, that Great Ruler whom I serve, is here during the night just as He is there during the night. The day and night equally belong to Him, to be used for His glory. As the sun glorifies Him in the daytime, and the moon and stars shine for Him at night, so may I live for Him and His glory – this is my prayer.

April 17, 2008

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading Sleepless in Addis Ababa

The Sleeping Church

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

The Sleeping Church

 David Alan Black 

America is facing the greatest crisis of her life, but you would hardly know it by listening to our Christian leaders. The church of Jesus Christ slumbers on, though occasionally it talks in its sleep. Although a divine institution, the church – or at least a large segment of it – has been corrupted by the society in which it exists.

One particular manifestation of this drowsiness – and one I have a deep and growing concern about – is the blind fealty many evangelical Christians give to their nation. This fusion of love of nation with love of God may rightly be called Christian nationalism – an “ism” that is just as hard to reconcile with the teaching of the Gospel as any other “ism” (e.g., legalism, Pelagianism, etc.). True believers give their supreme loyalty solely to Jesus Christ (solus Christus), not to the nation. If anyone claims that these two loyalties are identical, then they must close their minds to any theological argument.

Today this great struggle in American evangelicalism continues unabated. It is what we may call (not altogether inaccurately, I hope) a struggle between the compromising church and the confessing church. Truth claims and moral judgments have been replaced by seminars and satellite dishes. This loss of discrimination is all the more tragic in light of the fact that the information age has made biblical truth more accessible than ever. Sadly, the truth is ignored. Today, being “born again” is little more than an illusion. To the early church, uncompromising allegiance to the One True God was a badge of honor and a point of justifiable pride. As the author of the Epistle to Diognetus said of believers:

They dwell in all countries, but only as sojourners. As citizens, they share in all things with others and yet endure all things as if they were strangers. Every foreign land is to them as native country, and every land of birth as land of strangers.

Having recently visited the churches throughout Ethiopia, I can say that true discipleship is not confined to American Christianity. In fact, the church in the United States has a great deal to learn about discipleship from our African brethren. Ask any Ethiopian believer who passed through the fire of the Dirge (the Marxist rule from 1974-1991) and he will tell you that God’s truth draws lines and demands choices. The Ethiopian church is a standing challenge to every status quo. The church in the “over-developed” world could well learn a lesson from our “less-fortunate” brothers and sisters in the Third World. And that lesson is this: Jesus Christ stands as Lord over all who believe in Him; but He also stands as Lord over against all who disobey Him.

(By the way, if you haven’t traveled abroad recently, you might consider doing so. By standing outside our own culture, God’s people have a distance and detachment to aid discernment.)

Our slumber will soon catch up with us. I am pledged to try to re-awaken this sleeping giant. My first book dealing with this crisis, Why I Stopped Listening to Rush, is an attempt to answer the question of what we mean when we say that Jesus Christ is Lord. The focus is to set forth sound arguments that are being used to arouse a church that is doggedly committed to irrelevance and indebted to modernity. I invite you, dear reader, to join me in this gigantic task, for the season for slumber is long past, and the time for action has come. Are you willing to confess one God and to criticize everything else – party, power, wealth, prestige, ideology, government, church – whenever it threatens to usurp the place of God?

November 26, 2004

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading The Sleeping Church

Sister Wife

   restoring our biblical and constitutional foundations

                

Sister Wife

 David Alan Black  

Once in a while in my reading I run across an essay that is so beautifully expressed, so magnificently written, that it defies explanation and I simply must quote it. Yesterday I stumbled upon an essay of this caliber in the latest issue of Neotestamentica (43/1, 2009). I hope your institution’s library subscribes to this journal so that you can read the essay for yourself. It is entitled “Married Women and the Spread of Early Christianity” (pp. 145-94), and the author is Christoph Stenschke of the University of South Africa.

Referring to the key passage of 1 Cor. 9:5, where Paul argues that he has the right, as do all of the apostles, to be accompanied by a “sister wife,” Stenschke notes the widespread presence of missionary couples in the early church. Moreover, he argues, there is no evidence that the women had lesser roles than those of their male counterparts. In his words, “it is unlikely that these ‘apostolic’ wives came along only to look after their husbands and to butter sandwiches!” Quoting Margaret Mitchell, he concludes that “Missionary pairs appear to have been a characteristic of a Christian movement from the beginning, initiated already by Jesus….” Priscilla is but one example of an early Christian missionary who was married.

In an age when so much that is written about marriage is verbally pedantic, emotionally searing, and intellectually predicable, it is refreshing to come upon a work in which passion and perspective outrun technique. Stenschke’s final paragraph is the perfect peroration. It reads as follows (p. 189):

 

At a time when some of the traditional churches of Christendom face decline, the NT references to married women and the spread of the faith are inspiring. While the dignity and calling of marriage was rightly re-discovered and emphasized by the Protestant reformation over against celibate monastic traditions (cf. Luther’s affirmation of marriage), the significance of ordinary women (and men) of whatever marital status for spreading and revitalising [sic] the faith needs to be re-discovered and emphasized. That this is not an easy task, accomplished on a bed of roses, is also clear in the NT.

This business of a Christian being willing to be used by God in any situation is what military commanders call an SOP – Standard Operating Procedure. There is nothing new or unusual about it. This is what God wants, this is what He is after – husbands and wives, parents and children, brothers and sisters in Christ, all working together so that the life and light of Jesus may become visible in a dying and dark world.

There is a power in this principle that is quiet yet relentless. Becky and I have discovered it in our own marriage. Where everyday men and women are willing to lay down their lives for others, nothing can stop their message. It is well-nigh irresistible! God doesn’t care a snap of His fingers about all of our missionary strategies and techniques. Traditions mean nothing to Him. What He wants is a heart that is His, and a body that is available to Him. Jesus made it clear that His real mother and brothers and sisters were those who listened to His teachings and put them into practice. It is a mistake to ignore the instructions of Jesus and the example of the early church in this regard. Many times young people have come to me asking what the secret of a long and happy marriage is, expecting me to recommend to them the latest book on Christian marriage. Instead, I have pointed them to 1 Cor. 9:5 and 1 Cor. 7:29. The church of today needs to recover its understanding and experience of the missionary dimension of marriage. Our business as Christian couples is to help establish the kingdom of God through humble service to others. This is not a kingdom that can be identified with a capitalist paradise any more than it can be identified with a Marxist utopia. It is the cross, not a crown, which is at the heart of a truly Christlike marriage.

In short, as General Sherman might have said, a marriage centered upon itself is hell, an appalling mockery of what being husband and wife can and should be all about, an awful, idiotic, irrelevant joke, even though it isn’t funny. I’m not going to try and diagnose the major causes of marital illness, but certainly an emphasis on self-fulfillment and self-identity is at the top of the chart. Every good marriage must be a partnership as well as a marriage. Husband and wife share not only eros but agape, not only desire but duty, but God holds them together in His hand and He does so in such a way that their marriage proclaims a great mystery – the love of Christ for the church. A Christ-centered, other-focused marriage fosters unselfishness. It provides unity in the midst of real differences and difficulties. It speaks not of “my” home but “our” home, not of “my” calling but of “our” calling to serve Christ together.

When I think of Becky, and when I think of the joys and trials we’ve faced together in 33 years of married life, there is one word that keeps coming to my mind: grace. C. S. Lewis, about a month after he lost wife to cancer, began making notes about his grief that culminated in what many consider to be his most powerful book, A Grief Observed, which was first published under a pseudonym. His eulogy brings before us a picture of what we might call a truly grace-filled marriage (p. 39):

 

For a good wife contains so many persons in herself. What was H. not to me? She was my daughter and my mother, my pupil and my teacher, my subject and my sovereign; and always, holding all these in solution, my trusty comrade, friend, shipmate, fellow-soldier. My mistress; but at the same time all that any man friend (and I have good ones) has ever been to me. Perhaps more. If we had never fallen in love we should have none the less been always together, and created scandal. That’s what I meant when once I praised her for her ‘masculine virtues.’ But she soon put a stop to that by asking how I’d like to be praised for my feminine ones. It was a good riposte, dear. Yet there was something of the Amazon, something of Penthesileia and Camilla.

If, my friend, you have a “sister wife” like Lewis had, and like I do, you may count yourself blessed among men.

December 9, 2009

David Alan Black is the editor of www.daveblackonline.com.

Back to daveblackonline

Continue Reading Sister Wife